Log Clustering Approach Selection

Attribute weights
Objectives

Data & System

Clustering techniques

Evaluation











Approaches ranked by query similarity
  1. Nandi et al. (2016) - 1.0
  2. He et al. (2017a) - 0.973
  3. He et al. (2017b) - 0.973
  4. Vaarandi (2004) - 0.973
  5. Carasso (2012) - 0.959
  6. Salfner and Tschirpke (2008) - 0.935
  7. Zou et al. (2016) - 0.935
  8. Stearley (2004) - 0.924
  9. Aharon et al. (2009) - 0.918
  10. Chuah et al. (2010) - 0.908
  11. Kimura et al. (2014) - 0.908
  12. Gurumdimma et al. (2015) - 0.897
  13. Li et al. (2018) - 0.897
  14. Jia et al. (2017) - 0.891
  15. Du and Cao (2015) - 0.87
  16. Fu et al. (2009) - 0.87
  17. Zhang et al. (2019) - 0.853
  18. Du et al. (2016) - 0.826
  19. Makanju et al. (2009a) - 0.755
  20. Zulkernine et al. (2013) - 0.728
  21. Jayathilake et al. (2017) - 0.707
  22. Hamooni et al. (2016) - 0.701
  23. Vaarandi (2003) - 0.701
  24. Vaarandi and Pihelgas (2015) - 0.701
  25. Gainaru et al. (2011) - 0.69
  26. Li et al. (2017) - 0.69
  27. Messaoudi et al. (2018) - 0.69
  28. Qiu et al. (2010) - 0.69
  29. Shima (2016) - 0.69
  30. Taerat et al. (2011) - 0.69
  31. Thaler et al. (2017) - 0.69
  32. Sequence (2014) - 0.688
  33. Ning et al. (2014) - 0.679
  34. Zhao and Xiao (2016) - 0.679
  35. Mizutani (2013) - 0.674
  36. Tovarnak et al. (2019) - 0.674
  37. Christensen and Li (2013) - 0.663
  38. Agrawal et al. (2019) - 0.647
  39. Du and Li (2016) - 0.647
  40. Jiang et al. (2008) - 0.647
  41. Joshi et al. (2014) - 0.647
  42. Nagappan and Vouk (2010) - 0.647
  43. Tang and Li (2010) - 0.647
  44. Tang et al. (2011) - 0.647
  45. Juvonen et al. (2015) - 0.639
  46. Aussel et al. (2018) - 0.636
  47. Jain et al. (2009) - 0.636
  48. Menkovski and Petkovic (2017) - 0.636
  49. Wurzenberger et al. (2019) - 0.636
  50. Wurzenberger et al. (2017a) - 0.633
  51. Wurzenberger et al. (2017b) - 0.633
  52. Kobayashi et al. (2014) - 0.625
  53. Xu et al. (2009) - 0.429
  54. Lin et al. (2005) - 0.312
  55. Wang et al. (2018) - 0.283
  56. Schipper et al. (2019) - 0.147
  57. Leichtnam et al. (2017) - 0.122
  58. Ren et al. (2018) - 0.12
  59. Reidemeister et al. (2011) - 0.103
  60. Zhang et al. (2017) - 0.103
  61. Li et al. (2005) - 0.092
PCA